With regards to even more arguments on jurisdiction at this stage of your technique, the Tribunal has taken Be aware of the new reduction sought by Respondent relating to jurisdiction, and from the functions’ replies on the Tribunal’s Question 3. 53. The Respondent’s argument is premised about the mistaken belief that the value of Claimant

Even assuming quod non that this Tribunal has jurisdiction more than Claimant’s assert, there was no expropriation for which Claimant could recover. Being an Preliminary subject, Claimant by itself expressly disclaims an expropriation from the Yukos shares. Claimant alternatively seeks, depending on a misreading of Article 5(two) of the united ki